More on Netanyahu's imminent divestment powwow in DC, no inaccurate info on Ohio

1) From Stratfor:

U.S.: Netanyahu To Visit
June 19, 2007 16 32 GMT

Israeli opposition leader and Likud Party Chairman Benjamin Netanyahu is scheduled to leave for New York on June 19, where he is to discuss applying increased financial sanctions against Tehran to halt the country’s nuclear program. Netanyahu is to meet with a financial official to request freezing or withdrawing state pension funds invested in Iran worth hundreds of millions of dollars. He also is to meet with U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney, Democratic Party presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and Republican Party presidential candidate Fred Thompson in Washington, D.C.

The massive spread on the topic in last Thursday’s Wall Street Journal says the Bush Administration is opposed to such moves. But with meetings with Dick Cheney, Hillary Clinton and Fred Thompson? Now what?

Talk amongst yourselves, because there ain’t no news on this yet anywhere.

2) Update: From Ha’aretz. Now we get to understand a bit more – NY has been more successful in pursuing divestment at the state level. But it makes me curious to know if my state rep. and Ohio HB 151 sponsor Josh Mandel sought out Netanyahu to come to Ohio – would it have made a difference? I doubt it, but I wonder.

4 thoughts on “More on Netanyahu's imminent divestment powwow in DC, no inaccurate info on Ohio

  1. I didn’t think that you were conspiracy-minded, but the original wording left me wondering. Thanks for the prompt clarification.

  2. Oh goodness no – first, I don’t even read the WSJ on a regular basis. I really don’t have a sense at all on something like that. No – I was just using language to say 1) it was a big article and 2) the WSJ reported that information, as opposed to any other source saying (like the White House itself or something).I think the position actually comes from one of the cabinet secretaries or undersecretaries – I forget – I know I’ve seen it – just don’t remember where.No conspiracy idea – just attribution. Thanks for asking before assuming.

  3. The massive spread on the topic in last Thursday’s Wall Street Journal says the Bush Administration is opposed to such moves.Jill, I take that to mean that you think that the Bush Administration influences the coverage in the WSJ’s news pages. Is my interpretation correct? (That sounds improbable to me because I haven’t seen any evidence of it, but maybe you’ve seen something I haven’t.)

Comment here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s